Page 1 of 1
Would a strings of the UMD dumps be allowed here?
Posted: Fri May 06, 2005 11:33 pm
by ripnet
Hi,
Running
cat * | strings -9 | uniq
against the ripped UMD data produces quite a lot of interesting strings...
for example, we get
GCC: (GNU) 3.3.3+allegrex-2.2.1-psp-1.5.1.internal
and
host0:/usr/local/psp/devkit/module/pspnet.prx
and
sceKernelLoadModule()
and
SceParseHTTPheader_Library (on Ridge Racer) which i didnt think had a browser...
Of course, the most important conclusion from this is that the binaries are not encrypted (at least not entirely)...
I think we can learn a lot about how this thing works from these
i reckon they are still signed tho, and I reckon that the line that says
ULJS-00001|CCCD9317C815B9F5|0001|G|
has the signature in it. Unless im mistakes, the length of CCCD9317C815B9F5 is 64 bits, and not 128 bits (which is the length of the AES key)...
g
Posted: Fri May 06, 2005 11:39 pm
by Pikoro
Guess not. The mods killed my strings thread.
Posted: Sat May 07, 2005 12:42 am
by xaeon
Achtung! Teilen Sie nicht interessante Sachen hier mit!
... in English
Posted: Sat May 07, 2005 12:44 am
by ripnet
Babel Fish Translation:
Achtung! Teilen Sie nicht interessante Sachen hier mit!
=
Note! Do not communicate interesting things here!
:-O
Posted: Sat May 07, 2005 12:46 am
by MelGibson
xaeon wrote:Achtung! Teilen Sie nicht interessante Sachen hier mit!
German - translates to: Warning! Don't post interesting things here
Thats wasa useful 1st post xaeon. Congrats. Good puppy
Posted: Sat May 07, 2005 12:57 am
by xaeon
MelGibson wrote:xaeon wrote:Achtung! Teilen Sie nicht interessante Sachen hier mit!
German - translates to: Warning! Don't post interesting things here
Thats wasa useful 1st post xaeon. Congrats. Good puppy
Every bit as much as yours.
Re: Would a strings of the UMD dumps be allowed here?
Posted: Sat May 07, 2005 1:03 am
by MelGibson
ripnet wrote:
i reckon they are still signed tho, and I reckon that the line that says
ULJS-00001|CCCD9317C815B9F5|0001|G|
has the signature in it. Unless im mistakes, the length of CCCD9317C815B9F5 is 64 bits, and not 128 bits (which is the length of the AES key)...
No its 128bit. For each letter/number 8bit. but i think its rather some crc... don't have the iso though to check...
Re: Would a strings of the UMD dumps be allowed here?
Posted: Sat May 07, 2005 1:11 am
by xaeon
MelGibson wrote:ripnet wrote:
i reckon they are still signed tho, and I reckon that the line that says
ULJS-00001|CCCD9317C815B9F5|0001|G|
has the signature in it. Unless im mistakes, the length of CCCD9317C815B9F5 is 64 bits, and not 128 bits (which is the length of the AES key)...
No its 128bit. For each letter/number 8bit. but i think its rather some crc... don't have the iso though to check...
no, each hex digit is equivalent to 4 binary digits
1111=15=F
11111111=255=FF
Posted: Sat May 07, 2005 1:39 am
by MelGibson
ULJS-00001|CCCD9317C815B9F5|0001|G
hex
554C4A532D30303030317C434343443933313743383135423946357C303030317C47
43434344393331374338313542394635 128bit
but maybe i'm completly wrong :|
Posted: Sat May 07, 2005 1:59 am
by xaeon
MelGibson wrote:ULJS-00001|CCCD9317C815B9F5|0001|G
hex
554C4A532D30303030317C434343443933313743383135423946357C303030317C47
43434344393331374338313542394635 128bit
but maybe i'm completly wrong :|
CCCD9317C815B9F5 is a hexidecimal number that can be represented by 64 binary digits
however, if you are taking it as a string instead of a number, then each digit is represented by 2 hex digits, which would amount to 128 bits, so we're both right, it just depends on how its used.
Posted: Sat May 07, 2005 2:43 am
by blackdroid
runnings strings on binary data is the least interesting thing you potentially could do with distributed copyrighted binary data, if people think its interesting they can do so by themselves, no need to fill yet another useless thread with nonsense.
Posted: Tue May 10, 2005 4:48 pm
by MindWall
Mel, what you are looking at is:
(product ID)|(Unique Disk ID)|0001|G
the Unique Disk ID is sotred HEX here.