wooolF wrote:@xxxstarmanxxx
@csuper
@toker#
yes, the stuttering problem seems to be "solved" with using DiVX instead of XViD, but... the result quality of the DiVX encoding isn't any place near same encodings I do with XViD (at same bitrate or even lower (2000 vs 1200)). They are just too blurred (can be noticed very good when you see faces of people in full size). XViD encodings are very very detailed where DiVX simply blurrs the details away, thus using less CPU power and therefor no audio stuttering.
I might be wrong as I just did 2 encodings with DiVX (where I made over 40 with XViD), but for now I'm not happy with DiVX option. I've worked with graphics for + 8 years now and that's the way I make living, so I can see the visual difference between XViD and DiVX in no time...
If anyone thinks that they got the "UMD quality" DiVX encodings, please, share the INI (for mencoder), so I can try the same config here. Until then XViD isn't beaten by DiVX. The scene (warez one) chosen XViD codec for their releases not just because it's open source, but because of its quality... Remember that.
Hello mate.
Granted xvid library can produce a much better result at any bitrate over divx.
The problem currently is until Jonny has all the code cleaned up and optimised you're just not gonna be able to play 1200kbs xvid's at the mo.
I have a 2gb card and an average 2hr movie at 1200kbs 2pass divx comes in at 1120mb.
At 2000kbs 2pass an average movie encodes to 1.8gb - and is as close to UMD as I think I'm ever gonna get.
In 12 months time some of us will be buying 4gb memorystick duo pro's - which will make the PSP the ultimate portable video player for its time.
Then we can encode 3000-4000kbs movies and get our rocks off.
I will probrably move back to Xvid if it ever becomes less cpu intensive but for now Xvid over DivX only matters at low bitrates.
For instance if I was to set up a 2pass encode at 768kbs I would still use Xvid.
Lets all hope Jonny can find some cycles for Xvid'ers.
All the best
J.
