djhuevo wrote:coz this is not a court, steddy is not a defendant, and Im not a lawyer.
I only mentioned you by name because steddy had volunteered you as someone who could vouch for him. We didn't ask for witnesses, by the way. He was the one who brought it up.
djhuevo wrote:There are many legal/moral ways to figure out error codes. And ppl are not in obligation to told you how do that.
Reverse Engineering itself is not legaly clear around the world, and as we are no lawyers, can't talk so much about legality... but can talk to much about MORALITY...
In the context of these forums we have rules against using the official SDK as a potential source of technical information. Whenever someone shows up with a pile of new information with absolutely no mention of where it came from then it isn't far fetched to ask where it was found. If the question goes unanswered then we have no choice but to take that information down until its origins are explained.
A simple 'hey guys, these were in Puzzle Bobble' would have been sufficient. We're not asking for signed documentation and 3rd party verification. Just a little blurb.
As a side note, some people here are very new to the reversing process and very interested in learning how all this information is discovered. Mentioning where you found it may inspire someone to buy their own copy of Puzzle Bobble and try their hand at reversing it, using you as an inspiration.